Yesterday I wrote about a neat calculator trick that I had just learned.

We saw that if the calculator was set to degree mode, then times a high enough power of 10 is approximately .

A commenter named Robert suggested looking at the difference between this approximation for and itself. He remarked that the error is also approximately too (when multiplied by a sufficiently high power of 10)!

For example,

If we shift the decimal point over we get an approximation of :

Now we look at the error

which if we shift again is

Wow! Now why is *this* true?

The key observation is that

or in general,

where denotes the -digit integer of all 5′s. With a little algebra we see that

As I mentioned last time, if the calculator is in degree mode and , then . So,

This implies that

Now, the error in this approximation is

We can rewrite this as

### Like this:

Like Loading...

*Related*

Thanks for providing the explanation!

By:

Roberton February 19, 2010at 1:51 pm

[...] The math behind a neat calculator trick [Update: after you read this post, read my follow-up post.] [...]

By:

The math behind a neat calculator trick « Division by Zeroon February 19, 2010at 3:53 pm

Instead of remembering the decimal expansion for 1/180, I usually just remember that .kkkkkk… is k/9 (where k is any single digit). .1111… is 1/9, from which it follows that .222… is 2/9, etc.

The analogous statement is true in other numerical bases; for example, .222222… in base 3 is 2/3.

All of which follows trivially from the formula for infinite geometric sums, but remembering it this way is sometimes useful.

For example, 555555 is approximately 5/9 times 10^6.

By:

Nemoon February 19, 2010at 4:14 pm

“The analogous statement is true in other numerical bases; for example, .222222â€¦ in base 3 is 2/3.”

Shouldn’t that be 2/3 for base _4_, ie, the denominator is base – 1? To state it a different way, .22222… in base 3 is like .99999… in base 10 = 1.

By:

moiocion April 27, 2010at 11:56 am