<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LaTeX now available in Google Docs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://divisbyzero.com/2009/09/18/latex-now-available-in-google-docs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://divisbyzero.com/2009/09/18/latex-now-available-in-google-docs/</link>
	<description>A blog about math, puzzles, teaching, and academic technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 01:59:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bruce</title>
		<link>http://divisbyzero.com/2009/09/18/latex-now-available-in-google-docs/#comment-2500</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bruce]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 13:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://divisbyzero.com/?p=2113#comment-2500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It doesn&#039;t work. you can&#039;t use the Google Docs editor.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t work. you can&#8217;t use the Google Docs editor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larry</title>
		<link>http://divisbyzero.com/2009/09/18/latex-now-available-in-google-docs/#comment-2258</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[larry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 16:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://divisbyzero.com/?p=2113#comment-2258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you want to know why latex is better. You should try latex. 
Once you become experienced  with latex , it  is simply much much much faster than using a wysiwig editor. Typing in equations with a wysiwg is very frustrating to someone who knows latex.

Here&#039;s an analogy. Suppose you had to type in words with a &quot;word editor&quot; You click on a palette of letters and symbols and you have to type by clicking on letters. Now you&#039;ve given up the advantage of touch typing and are forcing people to hunt and peck for letters. Ridiculous.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want to know why latex is better. You should try latex.<br />
Once you become experienced  with latex , it  is simply much much much faster than using a wysiwig editor. Typing in equations with a wysiwg is very frustrating to someone who knows latex.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s an analogy. Suppose you had to type in words with a &#8220;word editor&#8221; You click on a palette of letters and symbols and you have to type by clicking on letters. Now you&#8217;ve given up the advantage of touch typing and are forcing people to hunt and peck for letters. Ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: indridi</title>
		<link>http://divisbyzero.com/2009/09/18/latex-now-available-in-google-docs/#comment-1389</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[indridi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 03:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://divisbyzero.com/?p=2113#comment-1389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Embedding Google docs using iframe in Google Wave + SpartanTex works pretty nicely that allows simultaneous editing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Embedding Google docs using iframe in Google Wave + SpartanTex works pretty nicely that allows simultaneous editing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Googledocs y LaTeX &#171; Bitácoras en Estadística</title>
		<link>http://divisbyzero.com/2009/09/18/latex-now-available-in-google-docs/#comment-1370</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Googledocs y LaTeX &#171; Bitácoras en Estadística]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 21:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://divisbyzero.com/?p=2113#comment-1370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] tener archivos de Word en internet, publicarlos si desean y utilizar un editor de texto en  (ver aquí). Me parece increíble, espero les [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tener archivos de Word en internet, publicarlos si desean y utilizar un editor de texto en  (ver aquí). Me parece increíble, espero les [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Richeson</title>
		<link>http://divisbyzero.com/2009/09/18/latex-now-available-in-google-docs/#comment-1095</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Richeson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://divisbyzero.com/?p=2113#comment-1095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dana, I completely agree about the pros/cons of DropBox. I&#039;m actually using it for an entire class of students. Fortunately, there is only one &quot;secretary&quot; per day, so only one person should be editing at any one time. But it would be great if they could put something together to make simultaneous collaboration better.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dana, I completely agree about the pros/cons of DropBox. I&#8217;m actually using it for an entire class of students. Fortunately, there is only one &#8220;secretary&#8221; per day, so only one person should be editing at any one time. But it would be great if they could put something together to make simultaneous collaboration better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D.C. Ernst</title>
		<link>http://divisbyzero.com/2009/09/18/latex-now-available-in-google-docs/#comment-1091</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[D.C. Ernst]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://divisbyzero.com/?p=2113#comment-1091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I meant to say something about Dropbox, as well, but forgot.  I&#039;m currently using Dropbox to collaborate on a paper that I am writing (using LaTeX) with two undergraduates.  The advantage is that each of us gets to use our own fancy LaTeX front ends.  The disadvantage is that two people cannot edit a document simultaneously and there is no structure in place to prevent this.  If two people edit the document, it is a race to the line to see who wins.  The loser gets relegated to &quot;conflicting version&quot; status and any changes have to be merged manually.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant to say something about Dropbox, as well, but forgot.  I&#8217;m currently using Dropbox to collaborate on a paper that I am writing (using LaTeX) with two undergraduates.  The advantage is that each of us gets to use our own fancy LaTeX front ends.  The disadvantage is that two people cannot edit a document simultaneously and there is no structure in place to prevent this.  If two people edit the document, it is a race to the line to see who wins.  The loser gets relegated to &#8220;conflicting version&#8221; status and any changes have to be merged manually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Richeson</title>
		<link>http://divisbyzero.com/2009/09/18/latex-now-available-in-google-docs/#comment-1089</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Richeson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://divisbyzero.com/?p=2113#comment-1089</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cool! I&#039;ve seen ScribTex, but not SpartanTex. That sounds like a great solution. 

As I wrote in &lt;a href=&quot;http://divisbyzero.com/2009/10/04/a-new-way-to-collaborate-dropbox/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this post&lt;/a&gt;, I have been using DropBox to work with my collaborator. But these seem like other good options.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool! I&#8217;ve seen ScribTex, but not SpartanTex. That sounds like a great solution. </p>
<p>As I wrote in <a href="http://divisbyzero.com/2009/10/04/a-new-way-to-collaborate-dropbox/" rel="nofollow">this post</a>, I have been using DropBox to work with my collaborator. But these seem like other good options.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Richeson</title>
		<link>http://divisbyzero.com/2009/09/18/latex-now-available-in-google-docs/#comment-1088</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Richeson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://divisbyzero.com/?p=2113#comment-1088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dana Ernst sent this to me by email and asked me to post it as a comment:

If you type up a full-fledged LaTeX document in Google Docs, then you can use SpartanTeX to compile it.  I haven&#039;t used this extensively, but did play with it quite a bit.  Here is the link for SpartanTeX:

http://tex.uncg.edu/login.php

Also, along the same lines, you can use ScribTeX for LaTeX document collaboration:

http://www.scribtex.com/pages/index]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dana Ernst sent this to me by email and asked me to post it as a comment:</p>
<p>If you type up a full-fledged LaTeX document in Google Docs, then you can use SpartanTeX to compile it.  I haven&#8217;t used this extensively, but did play with it quite a bit.  Here is the link for SpartanTeX:</p>
<p><a href="http://tex.uncg.edu/login.php" rel="nofollow">http://tex.uncg.edu/login.php</a></p>
<p>Also, along the same lines, you can use ScribTeX for LaTeX document collaboration:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.scribtex.com/pages/index" rel="nofollow">http://www.scribtex.com/pages/index</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JR</title>
		<link>http://divisbyzero.com/2009/09/18/latex-now-available-in-google-docs/#comment-1080</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 17:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://divisbyzero.com/?p=2113#comment-1080</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@blair if your mind set is that you care about how your stuff is displayed, that is, you have &quot;pictures in your mind&quot; then yes latex is a step backwards to you.  If on the other you don&#039;t care how it is displayed as long as someone seeing it thinks it looks professional, and all you care about is the content, then latex is great.   If you are about controlling content and not representation then you will eventually grow into latex.  

I started with latex in my first year as a masters student.  I am now in my first year as a phd student and at this point, I am sure latex saves me time on assignments.  Probably the first semester I started with it, it did not.  Second semester it was probably a tie.  After that, it started paying serious dividends. 

 Though that comes with a caveat: the reason it works for me (as a statistics student) is my course work standards are &quot;turn in something that looks professional&quot;, but there are no specific document rules to follow.   That sort of environment is great for latex because you don&#039;t have to get anything exactly right. If you were in course work where instructors typically had very demanding document standards and worse every other course seemed to use a different standard, that could get old very fast (unless they supplied the latex packages  and appropriate document stubs in which case latex would be solid gold).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@blair if your mind set is that you care about how your stuff is displayed, that is, you have &#8220;pictures in your mind&#8221; then yes latex is a step backwards to you.  If on the other you don&#8217;t care how it is displayed as long as someone seeing it thinks it looks professional, and all you care about is the content, then latex is great.   If you are about controlling content and not representation then you will eventually grow into latex.  </p>
<p>I started with latex in my first year as a masters student.  I am now in my first year as a phd student and at this point, I am sure latex saves me time on assignments.  Probably the first semester I started with it, it did not.  Second semester it was probably a tie.  After that, it started paying serious dividends. </p>
<p> Though that comes with a caveat: the reason it works for me (as a statistics student) is my course work standards are &#8220;turn in something that looks professional&#8221;, but there are no specific document rules to follow.   That sort of environment is great for latex because you don&#8217;t have to get anything exactly right. If you were in course work where instructors typically had very demanding document standards and worse every other course seemed to use a different standard, that could get old very fast (unless they supplied the latex packages  and appropriate document stubs in which case latex would be solid gold).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blair</title>
		<link>http://divisbyzero.com/2009/09/18/latex-now-available-in-google-docs/#comment-1046</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[blair]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 22:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://divisbyzero.com/?p=2113#comment-1046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever since wysiwig editors were invented, I never got the point of maintaining LaTeX...it&#039;s depressing to think that the most modern of technical minds are slaves to such technological inertia as to be hand-coding in an ASCII-based markup language instead of drawing their equations directly from the pictures in their minds, like Newton and Leibniz, then having the computer beautify them into scalable glyphs, like Newton and Leibnitz &lt;i&gt;wish&lt;/i&gt; they could have done...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever since wysiwig editors were invented, I never got the point of maintaining LaTeX&#8230;it&#8217;s depressing to think that the most modern of technical minds are slaves to such technological inertia as to be hand-coding in an ASCII-based markup language instead of drawing their equations directly from the pictures in their minds, like Newton and Leibniz, then having the computer beautify them into scalable glyphs, like Newton and Leibnitz <i>wish</i> they could have done&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

